[新聞] 她40歲嫁不掉:想找在台北市有房的男人 這要求很過分?消失
新聞標題:她40歲嫁不掉:想找在台北市有房的男人 這要求很過分?
新聞內容:
「如果能在26歲遇到Mr. Right,交往兩年,28歲結婚,30歲生第一個寶寶,32歲生第二
個寶寶,然後幸福快樂過一輩子,這樣就真的太完美了。」小桃從大學時就是在姊妹淘中
這樣說的。
若從外表來看,小桃也是中人之姿,雖然沒有大眼高鼻,可165公分的身高,纖細又一頭
長髮,化起妝來是頗有姿色,走在路上也算回頭率頗高的妹。也無怪從她大學開始,身邊
有不少男孩追求,小桃家境還不錯,爸媽寵自己也挑,在學校的那幾年,她愛的是高帥,
離開學校之後,她更期待高富帥,只是在眾人面前,不想被貼「拜金」標籤,說得那麼明
白罷了。
「我沒有甚麼條件啊,就是工作穩定、個性好、比我高、順眼,這樣就好了。」小桃都跟
朋友這樣說,和小桃熟的人都知道,就算有了上述條件…
(已全文照登蘋果報導)
新聞連結:https://goo.gl/37u2hm
心得
為什麼一定要靠男生?我和身邊的女生朋友都很希望自己可以買房 也是受到同儕影響 覺
得有間自己的房子總是比較好 如果因為房子在一起 還叫真愛嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.137.54.1
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WomenTalk/M.1504110226.A.651.html
推
08/31 00:28, , 1F
08/31 00:28, 1F
推
08/31 00:29, , 2F
08/31 00:29, 2F
推
08/31 00:29, , 3F
08/31 00:29, 3F
→
08/31 00:29, , 4F
08/31 00:29, 4F
→
08/31 00:30, , 5F
08/31 00:30, 5F
推
08/31 00:30, , 6F
08/31 00:30, 6F
推
08/31 00:30, , 7F
08/31 00:30, 7F
→
08/31 00:32, , 8F
08/31 00:32, 8F
噓
08/31 00:34, , 9F
08/31 00:34, 9F
推
08/31 00:36, , 10F
08/31 00:36, 10F
推
08/31 00:43, , 11F
08/31 00:43, 11F
→
08/31 00:44, , 12F
08/31 00:44, 12F
推
08/31 00:47, , 13F
08/31 00:47, 13F
推
08/31 00:47, , 14F
08/31 00:47, 14F
推
08/31 00:49, , 15F
08/31 00:49, 15F
推
08/31 00:51, , 16F
08/31 00:51, 16F
推
08/31 00:52, , 17F
08/31 00:52, 17F
→
08/31 00:52, , 18F
08/31 00:52, 18F
推
08/31 00:58, , 19F
08/31 00:58, 19F
→
08/31 01:05, , 20F
08/31 01:05, 20F
噓
08/31 01:05, , 21F
08/31 01:05, 21F
→
08/31 01:05, , 22F
08/31 01:05, 22F
推
08/31 01:18, , 23F
08/31 01:18, 23F
→
08/31 01:18, , 24F
08/31 01:18, 24F
→
08/31 01:23, , 25F
08/31 01:23, 25F
→
08/31 01:24, , 26F
08/31 01:24, 26F
→
08/31 01:24, , 27F
08/31 01:24, 27F
推
08/31 01:33, , 28F
08/31 01:33, 28F
推
08/31 01:39, , 29F
08/31 01:39, 29F
推
08/31 01:40, , 30F
08/31 01:40, 30F
→
08/31 01:40, , 31F
08/31 01:40, 31F
→
08/31 01:40, , 32F
08/31 01:40, 32F
→
08/31 01:42, , 33F
08/31 01:42, 33F
→
08/31 01:42, , 34F
08/31 01:42, 34F
噓
08/31 01:43, , 35F
08/31 01:43, 35F
→
08/31 01:47, , 36F
08/31 01:47, 36F
推
08/31 01:56, , 37F
08/31 01:56, 37F
→
08/31 01:57, , 38F
08/31 01:57, 38F
→
08/31 01:57, , 39F
08/31 01:57, 39F
→
08/31 01:59, , 40F
08/31 01:59, 40F
噓
08/31 02:03, , 41F
08/31 02:03, 41F
→
08/31 02:03, , 42F
08/31 02:03, 42F
推
08/31 02:04, , 43F
08/31 02:04, 43F
→
08/31 02:11, , 44F
08/31 02:11, 44F
→
08/31 02:12, , 45F
08/31 02:12, 45F
→
08/31 02:15, , 46F
08/31 02:15, 46F
→
08/31 02:17, , 47F
08/31 02:17, 47F
→
08/31 02:17, , 48F
08/31 02:17, 48F
→
08/31 02:17, , 49F
08/31 02:17, 49F
噓
08/31 02:20, , 50F
08/31 02:20, 50F
→
08/31 02:23, , 51F
08/31 02:23, 51F
推
08/31 03:04, , 52F
08/31 03:04, 52F
推
08/31 03:07, , 53F
08/31 03:07, 53F
推
08/31 03:31, , 54F
08/31 03:31, 54F
噓
08/31 03:38, , 55F
08/31 03:38, 55F
→
08/31 03:38, , 56F
08/31 03:38, 56F
噓
08/31 03:52, , 57F
08/31 03:52, 57F
噓
08/31 04:48, , 58F
08/31 04:48, 58F
推
08/31 05:23, , 59F
08/31 05:23, 59F
推
08/31 07:23, , 60F
08/31 07:23, 60F
推
08/31 07:35, , 61F
08/31 07:35, 61F
→
08/31 08:35, , 62F
08/31 08:35, 62F
推
08/31 08:48, , 63F
08/31 08:48, 63F
推
08/31 09:03, , 64F
08/31 09:03, 64F
推
08/31 09:11, , 65F
08/31 09:11, 65F
→
08/31 09:11, , 66F
08/31 09:11, 66F
推
08/31 09:22, , 67F
08/31 09:22, 67F
→
08/31 09:23, , 68F
08/31 09:23, 68F
→
08/31 09:27, , 69F
08/31 09:27, 69F
推
08/31 09:34, , 70F
08/31 09:34, 70F
→
08/31 09:35, , 71F
08/31 09:35, 71F
→
08/31 09:35, , 72F
08/31 09:35, 72F
噓
08/31 09:43, , 73F
08/31 09:43, 73F
推
08/31 10:13, , 74F
08/31 10:13, 74F
→
08/31 10:14, , 75F
08/31 10:14, 75F
噓
08/31 10:20, , 76F
08/31 10:20, 76F
推
08/31 10:22, , 77F
08/31 10:22, 77F
→
08/31 10:22, , 78F
08/31 10:22, 78F
→
08/31 10:22, , 79F
08/31 10:22, 79F
推
08/31 10:35, , 80F
08/31 10:35, 80F
推
08/31 10:38, , 81F
08/31 10:38, 81F
推
08/31 11:00, , 82F
08/31 11:00, 82F
→
08/31 11:16, , 83F
08/31 11:16, 83F
→
08/31 11:26, , 84F
08/31 11:26, 84F
推
08/31 12:26, , 85F
08/31 12:26, 85F
推
08/31 12:37, , 86F
08/31 12:37, 86F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):