Re: [問題] 2002年德國是怎麼贏韓國的?
※ 引述《a7107772 (haur)》之銘言:
: 結果時間一轉眼過了12年了
: 當年的季軍再也沒踢進過會內賽…
: 證明小時候對土耳其的想法有點錯誤
: 版上有大大能對當年土耳其的曇花一現
: 發表看法嗎
並不奇怪,最近幾屆世界盃都會有至少一支開賽前不被看好能進四強的球隊踢進四強。
上屆烏拉圭,上上屆葡萄牙,上上上屆土耳其和韓國,上上上上屆克羅地亞。
這幾支球隊比較有爭議的算是葡萄牙,畢竟2004年歐洲盃才剛拿到亞軍。
可是2006年世界盃幾乎沒人看好葡萄牙,最後居然一路殺進四強。
簡單來說就是一個月以內幾場比賽的短期決戰,比的是誰有辦法剛剛好在這時候爆氣。
一場決勝負的比賽跟棒球藍球差異就很大,要是世界盃也來玩七戰四勝那一套,
可以確定幾乎不會爆出冷門,但是七戰四勝的話世界盃就要踢一年了。
同理,今年最被看好的四支球隊:巴西、阿根廷、西班牙、德國
很可能會有一支球隊倒在四強的大門外,由一支賽前不被看好的球隊進四強。
誰有本事爆氣誰就有機會進去,但是這屆世界盃結束過後就打回原形,
下次要變身成超級射呀人可能都是二十年後的事情了。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.34.78.28
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WorldCup/M.1402668339.A.120.html
→
06/13 22:06, , 1F
06/13 22:06, 1F
推
06/13 22:07, , 2F
06/13 22:07, 2F
推
06/13 22:07, , 3F
06/13 22:07, 3F
→
06/13 22:07, , 4F
06/13 22:07, 4F
→
06/13 22:08, , 5F
06/13 22:08, 5F
推
06/13 22:08, , 6F
06/13 22:08, 6F
→
06/13 22:09, , 7F
06/13 22:09, 7F
推
06/13 22:10, , 8F
06/13 22:10, 8F
推
06/13 22:12, , 9F
06/13 22:12, 9F
→
06/13 22:13, , 10F
06/13 22:13, 10F
推
06/13 22:13, , 11F
06/13 22:13, 11F
推
06/13 22:14, , 12F
06/13 22:14, 12F
推
06/13 22:15, , 13F
06/13 22:15, 13F
推
06/13 22:15, , 14F
06/13 22:15, 14F
推
06/13 22:17, , 15F
06/13 22:17, 15F
推
06/13 22:17, , 16F
06/13 22:17, 16F
推
06/13 22:18, , 17F
06/13 22:18, 17F
推
06/13 22:18, , 18F
06/13 22:18, 18F
推
06/13 22:19, , 19F
06/13 22:19, 19F
推
06/13 22:19, , 20F
06/13 22:19, 20F
推
06/13 22:19, , 21F
06/13 22:19, 21F
→
06/13 22:20, , 22F
06/13 22:20, 22F
推
06/13 22:21, , 23F
06/13 22:21, 23F
推
06/13 22:22, , 24F
06/13 22:22, 24F
推
06/13 22:23, , 25F
06/13 22:23, 25F
→
06/13 22:24, , 26F
06/13 22:24, 26F
推
06/13 22:27, , 27F
06/13 22:27, 27F
推
06/13 22:27, , 28F
06/13 22:27, 28F
→
06/13 22:28, , 29F
06/13 22:28, 29F
推
06/13 22:30, , 30F
06/13 22:30, 30F
推
06/13 22:30, , 31F
06/13 22:30, 31F
推
06/13 22:31, , 32F
06/13 22:31, 32F
推
06/13 22:33, , 33F
06/13 22:33, 33F
推
06/13 22:33, , 34F
06/13 22:33, 34F
→
06/13 22:34, , 35F
06/13 22:34, 35F
→
06/13 22:35, , 36F
06/13 22:35, 36F
推
06/13 22:36, , 37F
06/13 22:36, 37F
→
06/13 22:36, , 38F
06/13 22:36, 38F
→
06/13 22:36, , 39F
06/13 22:36, 39F
→
06/13 22:37, , 40F
06/13 22:37, 40F
推
06/13 22:38, , 41F
06/13 22:38, 41F
推
06/13 22:38, , 42F
06/13 22:38, 42F
推
06/13 22:39, , 43F
06/13 22:39, 43F
→
06/13 22:40, , 44F
06/13 22:40, 44F
推
06/13 22:41, , 45F
06/13 22:41, 45F
→
06/13 22:41, , 46F
06/13 22:41, 46F
→
06/13 22:42, , 47F
06/13 22:42, 47F
推
06/13 22:42, , 48F
06/13 22:42, 48F
→
06/13 22:42, , 49F
06/13 22:42, 49F
→
06/13 22:42, , 50F
06/13 22:42, 50F
推
06/13 22:43, , 51F
06/13 22:43, 51F
推
06/13 22:51, , 52F
06/13 22:51, 52F
推
06/13 22:54, , 53F
06/13 22:54, 53F
推
06/13 23:09, , 54F
06/13 23:09, 54F
推
06/13 23:18, , 55F
06/13 23:18, 55F
推
06/13 23:19, , 56F
06/13 23:19, 56F
推
06/13 23:24, , 57F
06/13 23:24, 57F
推
06/13 23:24, , 58F
06/13 23:24, 58F
→
06/13 23:25, , 59F
06/13 23:25, 59F
推
06/13 23:31, , 60F
06/13 23:31, 60F
→
06/13 23:34, , 61F
06/13 23:34, 61F
→
06/13 23:35, , 62F
06/13 23:35, 62F
推
06/13 23:38, , 63F
06/13 23:38, 63F
推
06/13 23:41, , 64F
06/13 23:41, 64F
推
06/13 23:42, , 65F
06/13 23:42, 65F
→
06/13 23:43, , 66F
06/13 23:43, 66F
→
06/13 23:59, , 67F
06/13 23:59, 67F
→
06/14 00:48, , 68F
06/14 00:48, 68F
→
06/14 00:49, , 69F
06/14 00:49, 69F
推
06/14 01:51, , 70F
06/14 01:51, 70F
→
06/14 01:53, , 71F
06/14 01:53, 71F
推
06/14 06:54, , 72F
06/14 06:54, 72F
推
06/14 08:17, , 73F
06/14 08:17, 73F
噓
06/14 16:29, , 74F
06/14 16:29, 74F
→
06/14 16:29, , 75F
06/14 16:29, 75F
→
06/14 16:29, , 76F
06/14 16:29, 76F
→
06/14 16:30, , 77F
06/14 16:30, 77F
噓
06/14 23:44, , 78F
06/14 23:44, 78F
噓
06/15 14:52, , 79F
06/15 14:52, 79F
→
06/15 15:10, , 80F
06/15 15:10, 80F
討論串 (同標題文章)