[新車] rcs/g6/ft6/jets/tigra
《是否已閱讀置底文章『[新車] 2012主流車種比較』》
Yes
《是否至車行看過實車》
No
《欲比較之品牌及車種》
(1)rcs
(2)g6
(3)ft6
(4)jets
(5)tigra
《車主需求》 ← 請儘量詳細列舉以方便板友幫您建議
以下需求依序以最重要~最不重要
—有雙載需求
—單純郊區通勤(桃園算郊區吧)
—不玩改車
—本人174/68
—後置物希望可以[可樂帽(最好)或3/4]+雨衣x2
—前置物希望可以一瓶600ml房屋型飲料
《預算範圍》
內文的都沒問題 考慮需求才是重點
《補充說明》
有些車款有125/150 就請推薦我你覺得適合的吧
謝謝各位 然後我覺得ft6 g6其實蠻醜的 個人喜歡jets tigra這種有辨認度的外型 但如果都有到我需求 我還是可以不顧外型的
--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.140.21.197
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/biker/M.1474051681.A.0BF.html
推
09/17 02:52, , 1F
09/17 02:52, 1F
→
09/17 02:52, , 2F
09/17 02:52, 2F
→
09/17 02:57, , 3F
09/17 02:57, 3F
→
09/17 02:57, , 4F
09/17 02:57, 4F
推
09/17 02:57, , 5F
09/17 02:57, 5F
推
09/17 02:59, , 6F
09/17 02:59, 6F
→
09/17 02:59, , 7F
09/17 02:59, 7F
※ 編輯: Kndog (223.140.21.197), 09/17/2016 03:06:27
推
09/17 04:02, , 8F
09/17 04:02, 8F
→
09/17 04:02, , 9F
09/17 04:02, 9F
噓
09/17 04:04, , 10F
09/17 04:04, 10F
→
09/17 04:13, , 11F
09/17 04:13, 11F
→
09/17 04:13, , 12F
09/17 04:13, 12F
推
09/17 05:18, , 13F
09/17 05:18, 13F
推
09/17 05:27, , 14F
09/17 05:27, 14F
推
09/17 05:29, , 15F
09/17 05:29, 15F
推
09/17 05:42, , 16F
09/17 05:42, 16F
推
09/17 07:05, , 17F
09/17 07:05, 17F
→
09/17 07:05, , 18F
09/17 07:05, 18F
推
09/17 07:29, , 19F
09/17 07:29, 19F
推
09/17 07:36, , 20F
09/17 07:36, 20F
→
09/17 08:06, , 21F
09/17 08:06, 21F
→
09/17 08:49, , 22F
09/17 08:49, 22F
→
09/17 08:49, , 23F
09/17 08:49, 23F
推
09/17 09:05, , 24F
09/17 09:05, 24F
→
09/17 09:05, , 25F
09/17 09:05, 25F
推
09/17 09:16, , 26F
09/17 09:16, 26F
推
09/17 09:16, , 27F
09/17 09:16, 27F
推
09/17 09:18, , 28F
09/17 09:18, 28F
→
09/17 09:21, , 29F
09/17 09:21, 29F
→
09/17 09:33, , 30F
09/17 09:33, 30F
推
09/17 09:34, , 31F
09/17 09:34, 31F
推
09/17 09:53, , 32F
09/17 09:53, 32F
→
09/17 09:54, , 33F
09/17 09:54, 33F
推
09/17 09:58, , 34F
09/17 09:58, 34F
→
09/17 10:08, , 35F
09/17 10:08, 35F
推
09/17 10:17, , 36F
09/17 10:17, 36F
→
09/17 10:17, , 37F
09/17 10:17, 37F
推
09/17 11:13, , 38F
09/17 11:13, 38F
推
09/17 11:21, , 39F
09/17 11:21, 39F
推
09/17 11:22, , 40F
09/17 11:22, 40F
推
09/17 11:27, , 41F
09/17 11:27, 41F
→
09/17 11:37, , 42F
09/17 11:37, 42F
推
09/17 13:34, , 43F
09/17 13:34, 43F
→
09/17 13:34, , 44F
09/17 13:34, 44F
推
09/17 14:09, , 45F
09/17 14:09, 45F
推
09/17 14:14, , 46F
09/17 14:14, 46F
→
09/17 14:16, , 47F
09/17 14:16, 47F
→
09/17 14:19, , 48F
09/17 14:19, 48F
→
09/17 14:20, , 49F
09/17 14:20, 49F
推
09/17 14:25, , 50F
09/17 14:25, 50F
噓
09/17 14:40, , 51F
09/17 14:40, 51F
推
09/17 14:48, , 52F
09/17 14:48, 52F
推
09/17 15:13, , 53F
09/17 15:13, 53F
推
09/17 16:06, , 54F
09/17 16:06, 54F
→
09/17 16:07, , 55F
09/17 16:07, 55F
推
09/17 16:47, , 56F
09/17 16:47, 56F
推
09/17 18:39, , 57F
09/17 18:39, 57F
推
09/17 19:48, , 58F
09/17 19:48, 58F
推
09/17 20:08, , 59F
09/17 20:08, 59F
→
09/17 20:42, , 60F
09/17 20:42, 60F
→
09/17 20:42, , 61F
09/17 20:42, 61F
推
09/17 21:34, , 62F
09/17 21:34, 62F
推
09/17 22:20, , 63F
09/17 22:20, 63F
推
09/18 02:41, , 64F
09/18 02:41, 64F
推
09/18 03:14, , 65F
09/18 03:14, 65F
推
09/18 08:41, , 66F
09/18 08:41, 66F
噓
09/20 00:25, , 67F
09/20 00:25, 67F
→
09/20 00:25, , 68F
09/20 00:25, 68F
推
09/21 06:44, , 69F
09/21 06:44, 69F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):