[討論] 新馬三 V.S Elantra EX已回收
目前台灣中型房車裡70萬~80萬忠安全配備完整
講究操控性能舊式這兩台啦XD(這才是重視消費者安全麻)
New Mazda 3 V.S Elantra EX
用價格差不多的"Mazda 3 入門"和"Elantra旗艦款"做比較這樣才公平
這是小弟無聊做的表格,傷眼還請客位多多包涵
http://i.imgur.com/wEDZhuz.png
看起來安全配備兩者可說是不分軒輊
但Elantra又多了VSM!?不曉得哪位大大能解釋那是什麼功能
外型上Mazda3質感風而Elantra運動風各有愛好者
http://i.imgur.com/LbYaGgX.png
Mazda3內裝質感表現很好,利用很多碳纖維材質包覆
人馬一體的操控獲得好評But後座空間偏小
椅墊的大腿支撐不構而且偏硬,沒有冷氣出風口
前座涼爽後座不爽而且尊貴款沒有獨立空調和天窗有點可惜
兩個人出遊代步的話比較適合
日本進口價格卻國產價很有吸引力
KODO魂動設計線條真的很漂亮但是想到保養費用
進口一定比國產來的貴加上2.0的稅金又比較多雖然車價低
可是未來的費用卻高出許多....
Ex.Mazda6後視鏡16000NT,Camry5000NT不到
http://i.imgur.com/cQEJR8I.png
Elantra內裝適合年輕人,利用類金屬飾板充滿科技感
配合廣闊的車室空間乘坐起來比較沒有壓迫的感覺
後座有冷氣出風口這在中型房車中是很少見的配備
而且還有光感應式頭燈和雨滴感應雨刷等便利配備
1.8排氣量稅金省下不少在保養和維修上畢竟是國產車確實比進口便宜
(PS:國產車中要找到ESP+6顆安全氣囊實在不多阿....)
對於年輕人的需求,要操控、外型、安全
這兩台真的難分軒輊如果考量全部預算(含稅金未來保養維修費用等等...)
Elantra似乎比Mazda3更有競爭力些??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.235.249.54
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1419330274.A.DA2.html
→
12/23 18:26, , 1F
12/23 18:26, 1F
如果去除品牌情節呢?
推
12/23 18:27, , 2F
12/23 18:27, 2F
p大是怎麼判定的呢?撞擊測試?
推
12/23 18:27, , 3F
12/23 18:27, 3F
s大兩台都開過?
→
12/23 18:27, , 4F
12/23 18:27, 4F
推
12/23 18:35, , 5F
12/23 18:35, 5F
推
12/23 18:38, , 6F
12/23 18:38, 6F
希望不要歪樓啊!!可以正常討論嗎XD
推
12/23 18:39, , 7F
12/23 18:39, 7F
國產的車好像只有S5有送去"大陸"做撞擊測試,國外的撞擊測試僅供參考吧
※ 編輯: nodgop (111.235.249.54), 12/23/2014 18:42:15
推
12/23 18:40, , 8F
12/23 18:40, 8F
推
12/23 18:40, , 9F
12/23 18:40, 9F
→
12/23 18:41, , 10F
12/23 18:41, 10F
→
12/23 18:42, , 11F
12/23 18:42, 11F
推
12/23 18:42, , 12F
12/23 18:42, 12F
→
12/23 18:42, , 13F
12/23 18:42, 13F
推
12/23 18:43, , 14F
12/23 18:43, 14F
→
12/23 18:43, , 15F
12/23 18:43, 15F
推
12/23 18:43, , 16F
12/23 18:43, 16F
→
12/23 18:43, , 17F
12/23 18:43, 17F
→
12/23 18:43, , 18F
12/23 18:43, 18F
推
12/23 18:49, , 19F
12/23 18:49, 19F
→
12/23 18:50, , 20F
12/23 18:50, 20F
推
12/23 18:52, , 21F
12/23 18:52, 21F
→
12/23 18:52, , 22F
12/23 18:52, 22F
推
12/23 18:57, , 23F
12/23 18:57, 23F
→
12/23 18:59, , 24F
12/23 18:59, 24F
→
12/23 19:10, , 25F
12/23 19:10, 25F
推
12/23 19:14, , 26F
12/23 19:14, 26F
→
12/23 19:15, , 27F
12/23 19:15, 27F
推
12/23 19:15, , 28F
12/23 19:15, 28F
→
12/23 19:17, , 29F
12/23 19:17, 29F
→
12/23 19:19, , 30F
12/23 19:19, 30F
→
12/23 19:20, , 31F
12/23 19:20, 31F
推
12/23 19:26, , 32F
12/23 19:26, 32F
→
12/23 19:34, , 33F
12/23 19:34, 33F
→
12/23 19:37, , 34F
12/23 19:37, 34F
→
12/23 19:37, , 35F
12/23 19:37, 35F
推
12/23 19:58, , 36F
12/23 19:58, 36F
推
12/23 19:59, , 37F
12/23 19:59, 37F
→
12/23 20:00, , 38F
12/23 20:00, 38F
→
12/23 20:01, , 39F
12/23 20:01, 39F
推
12/23 20:03, , 40F
12/23 20:03, 40F
推
12/23 20:04, , 41F
12/23 20:04, 41F
→
12/23 20:04, , 42F
12/23 20:04, 42F
→
12/23 20:04, , 43F
12/23 20:04, 43F
推
12/23 20:14, , 44F
12/23 20:14, 44F
推
12/23 20:33, , 45F
12/23 20:33, 45F
推
12/23 20:35, , 46F
12/23 20:35, 46F
推
12/23 20:50, , 47F
12/23 20:50, 47F
→
12/23 20:50, , 48F
12/23 20:50, 48F
→
12/23 20:53, , 49F
12/23 20:53, 49F
→
12/23 20:57, , 50F
12/23 20:57, 50F
→
12/23 20:58, , 51F
12/23 20:58, 51F
→
12/23 21:02, , 52F
12/23 21:02, 52F
推
12/23 21:11, , 53F
12/23 21:11, 53F
→
12/23 21:17, , 54F
12/23 21:17, 54F
推
12/23 21:17, , 55F
12/23 21:17, 55F
→
12/23 21:32, , 56F
12/23 21:32, 56F
推
12/23 21:38, , 57F
12/23 21:38, 57F
推
12/23 21:39, , 58F
12/23 21:39, 58F
→
12/23 21:57, , 59F
12/23 21:57, 59F
推
12/23 22:07, , 60F
12/23 22:07, 60F
推
12/23 22:17, , 61F
12/23 22:17, 61F
推
12/23 22:18, , 62F
12/23 22:18, 62F
→
12/23 22:19, , 63F
12/23 22:19, 63F
→
12/23 22:27, , 64F
12/23 22:27, 64F
推
12/23 22:42, , 65F
12/23 22:42, 65F
推
12/23 22:57, , 66F
12/23 22:57, 66F
→
12/23 23:12, , 67F
12/23 23:12, 67F
推
12/24 00:46, , 68F
12/24 00:46, 68F
→
12/24 00:56, , 69F
12/24 00:56, 69F
推
12/24 00:58, , 70F
12/24 00:58, 70F
推
12/24 09:13, , 71F
12/24 09:13, 71F
→
12/24 09:14, , 72F
12/24 09:14, 72F
→
12/24 09:18, , 73F
12/24 09:18, 73F
推
12/24 14:16, , 74F
12/24 14:16, 74F
推
12/24 16:01, , 75F
12/24 16:01, 75F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):