[討論] 星際效應的時間問題,用最簡單的比喻?
看板movie作者ejeanstone (內湖米達麥亞-帝國軍647T)時間9年前 (2014/11/09 16:37)推噓56(58推 2噓 56→)留言116則, 54人參與討論串1/14 (看更多)
防雷
昨晚跟閃光去看,看完就陷入無盡的討論模式。
其他的她大概都理解,就是最簡單的一小時=七年他一直不能理解。
我找了一堆網站給她看,也看了版友的圖解,她還是在鑽為什麼時間會被壓縮的牛角尖,
問到本來以為好像懂的我也快糊塗了。
她說東西大小與距離長短的無限她可以想像,但是時間一直在進行,她沒辦法想像時間可
以被比較。
有沒有更淺顯易懂的說法或比喻讓她一聽就懂?
感謝各位二類組天才們了。
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.83.50.138
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/movie/M.1415522224.A.4DB.html
→
11/09 16:40, , 1F
11/09 16:40, 1F
推
11/09 16:41, , 2F
11/09 16:41, 2F
推
11/09 16:41, , 3F
11/09 16:41, 3F
→
11/09 16:41, , 4F
11/09 16:41, 4F
→
11/09 16:42, , 5F
11/09 16:42, 5F
推
11/09 16:42, , 6F
11/09 16:42, 6F
推
11/09 16:44, , 7F
11/09 16:44, 7F
推
11/09 16:45, , 8F
11/09 16:45, 8F
→
11/09 16:45, , 9F
11/09 16:45, 9F
→
11/09 16:46, , 10F
11/09 16:46, 10F
推
11/09 16:46, , 11F
11/09 16:46, 11F
→
11/09 16:46, , 12F
11/09 16:46, 12F
→
11/09 16:47, , 13F
11/09 16:47, 13F
推
11/09 16:47, , 14F
11/09 16:47, 14F
推
11/09 16:47, , 15F
11/09 16:47, 15F
→
11/09 16:47, , 16F
11/09 16:47, 16F
→
11/09 16:47, , 17F
11/09 16:47, 17F
推
11/09 16:48, , 18F
11/09 16:48, 18F
→
11/09 16:50, , 19F
11/09 16:50, 19F
推
11/09 16:52, , 20F
11/09 16:52, 20F
推
11/09 16:54, , 21F
11/09 16:54, 21F
推
11/09 16:54, , 22F
11/09 16:54, 22F
推
11/09 16:55, , 23F
11/09 16:55, 23F
→
11/09 16:55, , 24F
11/09 16:55, 24F
→
11/09 16:57, , 25F
11/09 16:57, 25F
推
11/09 16:57, , 26F
11/09 16:57, 26F
→
11/09 16:57, , 27F
11/09 16:57, 27F
→
11/09 16:58, , 28F
11/09 16:58, 28F
→
11/09 16:58, , 29F
11/09 16:58, 29F
推
11/09 16:58, , 30F
11/09 16:58, 30F
→
11/09 16:58, , 31F
11/09 16:58, 31F
→
11/09 16:58, , 32F
11/09 16:58, 32F
→
11/09 16:59, , 33F
11/09 16:59, 33F
噓
11/09 17:01, , 34F
11/09 17:01, 34F
推
11/09 17:01, , 35F
11/09 17:01, 35F
→
11/09 17:01, , 36F
11/09 17:01, 36F
推
11/09 17:03, , 37F
11/09 17:03, 37F
→
11/09 17:04, , 38F
11/09 17:04, 38F
推
11/09 17:05, , 39F
11/09 17:05, 39F
還有 37 則推文
推
11/09 18:08, , 77F
11/09 18:08, 77F
推
11/09 18:17, , 78F
11/09 18:17, 78F
推
11/09 18:32, , 79F
11/09 18:32, 79F
推
11/09 18:45, , 80F
11/09 18:45, 80F
推
11/09 19:00, , 81F
11/09 19:00, 81F
推
11/09 19:07, , 82F
11/09 19:07, 82F
→
11/09 19:08, , 83F
11/09 19:08, 83F
推
11/09 19:15, , 84F
11/09 19:15, 84F
→
11/09 19:16, , 85F
11/09 19:16, 85F
推
11/09 19:33, , 86F
11/09 19:33, 86F
→
11/09 19:33, , 87F
11/09 19:33, 87F
→
11/09 19:34, , 88F
11/09 19:34, 88F
推
11/09 19:34, , 89F
11/09 19:34, 89F
推
11/09 19:36, , 90F
11/09 19:36, 90F
→
11/09 19:36, , 91F
11/09 19:36, 91F
→
11/09 19:36, , 92F
11/09 19:36, 92F
推
11/09 19:45, , 93F
11/09 19:45, 93F
→
11/09 19:47, , 94F
11/09 19:47, 94F
推
11/09 21:19, , 95F
11/09 21:19, 95F
推
11/09 21:50, , 96F
11/09 21:50, 96F
推
11/09 22:02, , 97F
11/09 22:02, 97F
→
11/09 22:11, , 98F
11/09 22:11, 98F
推
11/09 22:26, , 99F
11/09 22:26, 99F
推
11/09 22:59, , 100F
11/09 22:59, 100F
→
11/09 23:00, , 101F
11/09 23:00, 101F
推
11/09 23:48, , 102F
11/09 23:48, 102F
推
11/10 00:18, , 103F
11/10 00:18, 103F
→
11/10 00:18, , 104F
11/10 00:18, 104F
→
11/10 00:18, , 105F
11/10 00:18, 105F
→
11/10 00:34, , 106F
11/10 00:34, 106F
推
11/10 02:48, , 107F
11/10 02:48, 107F
推
11/10 02:49, , 108F
11/10 02:49, 108F
→
11/10 02:50, , 109F
11/10 02:50, 109F
推
11/10 02:58, , 110F
11/10 02:58, 110F
推
11/10 02:59, , 111F
11/10 02:59, 111F
推
11/16 00:26, , 112F
11/16 00:26, 112F
推
11/17 00:23, , 113F
11/17 00:23, 113F
→
11/17 00:23, , 114F
11/17 00:23, 114F
推
01/27 11:52, , 115F
01/27 11:52, 115F
噓
08/29 15:06, , 116F
08/29 15:06, 116F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 14 篇):