[問題] 配錯重配要加錢是正常的嗎?
看板optical作者danccshoei (水的啦~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~)時間9年前 (2015/07/28 23:18)推噓6(16推 10噓 97→)留言123則, 12人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)
上周去眼鏡店配了新眼鏡,
結果拿到後覺得左眼看久會痛,就把左右眼分別遮起來看遠方,
發現右眼看得到的左眼看不到,雖然我原本慣用眼就右眼,比較清楚正常,
但我覺得差的有點多,於是就回店家詢問,
店家說要重配可以,但是要加錢,
且店家一直說要我去眼科開驗光單,今天去檢查時醫生也說我左眼是不是配不夠度數,
我配的是HOYA1.6 SFT 的,不知道算不算高級鏡片,
總價4XXX,接近5000,重配左眼的話要多加800元,
請問這個價格合理嗎? 因為爬文看配錯重配幾乎都不用錢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.168.117.63
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/optical/M.1438096703.A.8E4.html
※ 編輯: danccshoei (118.168.108.203), 07/29/2015 00:11:11
→
07/29 00:15, , 1F
07/29 00:15, 1F
→
07/29 00:15, , 2F
07/29 00:15, 2F
→
07/29 00:15, , 3F
07/29 00:15, 3F
→
07/29 00:15, , 4F
07/29 00:15, 4F
→
07/29 00:15, , 5F
07/29 00:15, 5F
我現在的錯誤度數是眼鏡行驗的,但他說要去我眼科掛號驗完回來才讓我重配
※ 編輯: danccshoei (118.168.108.203), 07/29/2015 00:17:25
→
07/29 00:23, , 6F
07/29 00:23, 6F
→
07/29 00:23, , 7F
07/29 00:23, 7F
店家說:因為這是訂製的片,價格高,所以重做要補錢,不然報廢鏡片誰吸收
※ 編輯: danccshoei (118.168.108.203), 07/29/2015 00:35:12
→
07/29 00:42, , 8F
07/29 00:42, 8F
推
07/29 01:10, , 9F
07/29 01:10, 9F
噓
07/29 02:14, , 10F
07/29 02:14, 10F
噓
07/29 02:18, , 11F
07/29 02:18, 11F
→
07/29 02:18, , 12F
07/29 02:18, 12F
噓
07/29 02:21, , 13F
07/29 02:21, 13F
→
07/29 02:21, , 14F
07/29 02:21, 14F
→
07/29 02:21, , 15F
07/29 02:21, 15F
根本沒看內文的推文刪掉正常吧,我內文有提應不應該?
一段話還特地分三個噓,意圖不明。
→
07/29 03:32, , 16F
07/29 03:32, 16F
→
07/29 03:32, , 17F
07/29 03:32, 17F
→
07/29 03:36, , 18F
07/29 03:36, 18F
→
07/29 03:38, , 19F
07/29 03:38, 19F
推
07/29 06:30, , 20F
07/29 06:30, 20F
推
07/29 08:41, , 21F
07/29 08:41, 21F
→
07/29 08:42, , 22F
07/29 08:42, 22F
→
07/29 08:42, , 23F
07/29 08:42, 23F
既然沒有規定不能刪推文,那請問刪推文要經過別人同意的規定是?
且該推文幾近無意義,沒看內文就噓文對於原文對於本版有何助益?
※ 編輯: danccshoei (118.168.108.203), 07/29/2015 08:48:57
※ 編輯: danccshoei (118.168.108.203), 07/29/2015 08:52:01
推
07/29 08:51, , 24F
07/29 08:51, 24F
→
07/29 08:51, , 25F
07/29 08:51, 25F
→
07/29 08:51, , 26F
07/29 08:51, 26F
→
07/29 08:52, , 27F
07/29 08:52, 27F
→
07/29 08:52, , 28F
07/29 08:52, 28F
→
07/29 08:53, , 29F
07/29 08:53, 29F
→
07/29 08:53, , 30F
07/29 08:53, 30F
→
07/29 08:55, , 31F
07/29 08:55, 31F
→
07/29 08:55, , 32F
07/29 08:55, 32F
→
07/29 08:57, , 33F
07/29 08:57, 33F
→
07/29 08:57, , 34F
07/29 08:57, 34F
→
07/29 08:58, , 35F
07/29 08:58, 35F
還有 51 則推文
還有 9 段內文
→
07/30 02:45, , 87F
07/30 02:45, 87F
你劈頭就罵別人白目,請問你又有什麼好原諒?
※ 編輯: danccshoei (118.168.106.84), 07/30/2015 02:46:15
→
07/30 02:46, , 88F
07/30 02:46, 88F
→
07/30 02:47, , 89F
07/30 02:47, 89F
原文會保留,明天就會刪掉本文無關之推噓文,謝謝指教。
※ 編輯: danccshoei (118.168.106.84), 07/30/2015 02:51:06
→
07/30 02:51, , 90F
07/30 02:51, 90F
→
07/30 02:51, , 91F
07/30 02:51, 91F
噓
07/30 02:54, , 92F
07/30 02:54, 92F
推
07/30 02:56, , 93F
07/30 02:56, 93F
→
07/30 02:56, , 94F
07/30 02:56, 94F
→
07/30 02:56, , 95F
07/30 02:56, 95F
→
07/30 02:56, , 96F
07/30 02:56, 96F
→
07/30 02:56, , 97F
07/30 02:56, 97F
→
07/30 03:09, , 98F
07/30 03:09, 98F
→
07/30 03:14, , 99F
07/30 03:14, 99F
→
07/30 03:15, , 100F
07/30 03:15, 100F
噓
07/30 03:19, , 101F
07/30 03:19, 101F
推
07/30 09:03, , 102F
07/30 09:03, 102F
→
07/30 09:44, , 103F
07/30 09:44, 103F
→
07/30 09:45, , 104F
07/30 09:45, 104F
推
07/30 09:53, , 105F
07/30 09:53, 105F
→
07/30 09:53, , 106F
07/30 09:53, 106F
推
07/30 09:55, , 107F
07/30 09:55, 107F
→
07/30 09:55, , 108F
07/30 09:55, 108F
哈哈,反正本篇已經被某人達成目的搞到失焦了,隨意就好。
※ 編輯: danccshoei (118.168.106.84), 07/30/2015 10:58:23
→
07/30 11:00, , 109F
07/30 11:00, 109F
→
07/30 21:47, , 110F
07/30 21:47, 110F
推
07/30 21:54, , 111F
07/30 21:54, 111F
→
07/30 21:58, , 112F
07/30 21:58, 112F
推
07/30 21:58, , 113F
07/30 21:58, 113F
→
07/30 22:42, , 114F
07/30 22:42, 114F
→
07/30 22:43, , 115F
07/30 22:43, 115F
→
07/30 22:43, , 116F
07/30 22:43, 116F
→
07/30 22:43, , 117F
07/30 22:43, 117F
噓
07/31 01:57, , 118F
07/31 01:57, 118F
推
08/02 02:22, , 119F
08/02 02:22, 119F
推
08/02 12:18, , 120F
08/02 12:18, 120F
→
08/02 12:20, , 121F
08/02 12:20, 121F
→
08/02 12:20, , 122F
08/02 12:20, 122F
→
08/02 12:21, , 123F
08/02 12:21, 123F
討論串 (同標題文章)