Re: [新聞] 性侵打死再焚屍 法官:無殺人犯意消失
※ 引述《justwater (halfwater)》之銘言:
: 媒體很聳動 ,鄉民跟著走 !
: 說明一下各種判決
: 先姦後殺:罪刑最重 ,犯加重強制性交和殺人罪 。
: 先殺後姦:殺人罪及毀損屍體罪 。
: 以上兩者並無疑義 ,在法醫解剖上也容易判定 。
: 最難的部份在
: 《邊姦邊殺 》,因為此時犯意屬主觀意思 ,有可能為傷害或殺害兩種差別 ,僅能從客
: 觀行為去判斷加害人是否有殺害被害人的意圖 。
: 案中描述 ,有加害人回去案發現場查視被害人 ,表示加害人沒有殺害的犯意 ,因此有
針對這段,加害者回去案發現場查視被害者,發現被害者「傷重氣絕」,無馬上將受害者
送醫急救,反而通知其餘四人到場,針對已經傷重氣絕之受害者,再度施暴,導致被害者
死亡。(這段你他媽跟我說沒有殺人的意圖?)
並淋上汽油焚燒受害者遺體(故意殺人之後,為避免犯行曝光,惡意焚屍,湮滅證據),
請問這五人的做法哪邊跟惡意犯行沒關係啊?法律人們,你們讀法律真的是單純
只為了$$$嗎?只有要錢,就可以幫加害者狂鑽法律漏洞,順便把自己良心都可以拿去
丟了?
: 此判決 ,但不苟的是 ,一人之行為同時為其餘四人的犯意延伸和揣測 ,實為不妥 。
: 要罵法官之前麻煩想一下哪邊該罵哪邊不該罵好嗎…
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.163.137.180
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1490085097.A.AED.html
推
03/21 16:32, , 1F
03/21 16:32, 1F
推
03/21 16:32, , 2F
03/21 16:32, 2F
※ 編輯: ren740719 (118.163.137.180), 03/21/2017 16:32:42
推
03/21 16:32, , 3F
03/21 16:32, 3F
判決書單純就是法律人為了$$$,特地幫加害者鑽法律漏洞的垃圾阿,整份跟良心一樣
黑到發亮,看了只會瞎了我的眼。
→
03/21 16:32, , 4F
03/21 16:32, 4F
噓
03/21 16:33, , 5F
03/21 16:33, 5F
※ 編輯: ren740719 (118.163.137.180), 03/21/2017 16:35:49
→
03/21 16:33, , 6F
03/21 16:33, 6F
→
03/21 16:34, , 7F
03/21 16:34, 7F
推
03/21 16:34, , 8F
03/21 16:34, 8F
噓
03/21 16:34, , 9F
03/21 16:34, 9F
→
03/21 16:34, , 10F
03/21 16:34, 10F
推
03/21 16:35, , 11F
03/21 16:35, 11F
推
03/21 16:36, , 12F
03/21 16:36, 12F
推
03/21 16:37, , 13F
03/21 16:37, 13F
推
03/21 16:37, , 14F
03/21 16:37, 14F
→
03/21 16:37, , 15F
03/21 16:37, 15F
推
03/21 16:37, , 16F
03/21 16:37, 16F
噓
03/21 16:37, , 17F
03/21 16:37, 17F
推
03/21 16:38, , 18F
03/21 16:38, 18F
→
03/21 16:38, , 19F
03/21 16:38, 19F
→
03/21 16:40, , 20F
03/21 16:40, 20F
→
03/21 16:41, , 21F
03/21 16:41, 21F
→
03/21 16:41, , 22F
03/21 16:41, 22F
推
03/21 16:41, , 23F
03/21 16:41, 23F
→
03/21 16:41, , 24F
03/21 16:41, 24F
→
03/21 16:42, , 25F
03/21 16:42, 25F
推
03/21 16:43, , 26F
03/21 16:43, 26F
推
03/21 16:43, , 27F
03/21 16:43, 27F
噓
03/21 16:44, , 28F
03/21 16:44, 28F
推
03/21 16:45, , 29F
03/21 16:45, 29F
噓
03/21 16:45, , 30F
03/21 16:45, 30F
→
03/21 16:46, , 31F
03/21 16:46, 31F
推
03/21 16:47, , 32F
03/21 16:47, 32F
→
03/21 16:47, , 33F
03/21 16:47, 33F
→
03/21 16:47, , 34F
03/21 16:47, 34F
推
03/21 16:49, , 35F
03/21 16:49, 35F
推
03/21 16:55, , 36F
03/21 16:55, 36F
→
03/21 16:57, , 37F
03/21 16:57, 37F
推
03/21 16:57, , 38F
03/21 16:57, 38F
噓
03/21 16:58, , 39F
03/21 16:58, 39F
→
03/21 17:00, , 40F
03/21 17:00, 40F
噓
03/21 17:04, , 41F
03/21 17:04, 41F
→
03/21 17:04, , 42F
03/21 17:04, 42F
我不是醫學系的,但是印象中氣絕不表示一定死亡,但就算沒死,被潑汽油焚燒也必死了
推
03/21 17:06, , 43F
03/21 17:06, 43F
我奉公守法,這輩子大概是沒啥機會上法院,就不勞您費心了。
→
03/21 17:07, , 44F
03/21 17:07, 44F
→
03/21 17:08, , 45F
03/21 17:08, 45F
推
03/21 17:09, , 46F
03/21 17:09, 46F
※ 編輯: ren740719 (118.163.137.180), 03/21/2017 17:12:30
噓
03/21 17:16, , 47F
03/21 17:16, 47F
推
03/21 17:18, , 48F
03/21 17:18, 48F
推
03/21 17:52, , 49F
03/21 17:52, 49F
噓
03/21 18:06, , 50F
03/21 18:06, 50F
推
03/21 18:07, , 51F
03/21 18:07, 51F
推
03/21 18:24, , 52F
03/21 18:24, 52F
→
03/21 18:25, , 53F
03/21 18:25, 53F
噓
03/22 00:43, , 54F
03/22 00:43, 54F
推
03/22 01:21, , 55F
03/22 01:21, 55F
→
03/22 09:52, , 56F
03/22 09:52, 56F
推
03/22 16:30, , 57F
03/22 16:30, 57F
推
03/23 09:22, , 58F
03/23 09:22, 58F
推
03/23 09:23, , 59F
03/23 09:23, 59F
推
03/23 09:24, , 60F
03/23 09:24, 60F
討論串 (同標題文章)