[新聞]勞團轟「死得不夠多」林美珠怒回:栽贓汙衊消失
https://news.ftv.com.tw/news/detail/2017A19F17M1
民視
勞團轟「死得不夠多」 林美珠怒回:栽贓汙衊
2017/10/19 18:29:31
颱風天只有公務員可享「有薪颱風假」,今天(10月19日)朝野立委們祭出甲級動員,提
出6個修法草案,要求修法,讓勞工休颱風假也要給薪,如果出勤則需要給雙倍薪水。甚
至有勞團代表上台提出質疑,難道「勞工死得不夠多,才不放颱風假?」,這番話觸怒勞
動部長林美珠,她動怒回應不容許栽贓汙衊,表示抗議!
勞動部長林美珠,出席立院衛環委員會,開會前,幕僚在旁不停提醒資訊,因為今天這場
備詢,立委們全都有備而來,要力拚將颱風假,納入勞基法修法草案,甚至祭出甲級動員
,因應備戰。沒想到勞團代表的這番話,卻讓林美珠板起臉孔!
「青年勞動九五聯盟」理事胡孟瑀:「是不是因為人死得不夠多,所以勞動部還不願意放
手,我想勞動部絕對是要好好的想清楚。」
勞動部長林美珠針:
「對剛剛的發言,今天我們在立法院是一個理性討論問題的地方,
我不需要用這種栽贓汙衊的言詞,
來這邊發表意見,我能不能表達我的抗議。」
林美珠動怒回批,強烈回應,氣氛變得超尷尬!為了保障勞工權益,包括國民黨、民進黨
和親民黨,總共提出6個修法草案,都認為颱風天停班,勞工如果出勤要給雙倍工資,不
出勤則要照給薪。
颱風假納不納勞基法?給不給薪?林美珠只說世界各國沒有相關規定,而且各行業差異大
,要凝聚共識,通盤研議,等於給委員們,碰了軟釘子,何時有解?還是個問號。(民視
新聞許敬柔、陳信諺台北報導)
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 219.80.253.8
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1508471987.A.F36.html
噓
10/20 12:00, , 1F
10/20 12:00, 1F
推
10/20 12:01, , 2F
10/20 12:01, 2F
噓
10/20 12:01, , 3F
10/20 12:01, 3F
噓
10/20 12:01, , 4F
10/20 12:01, 4F
噓
10/20 12:01, , 5F
10/20 12:01, 5F
噓
10/20 12:01, , 6F
10/20 12:01, 6F
噓
10/20 12:02, , 7F
10/20 12:02, 7F
噓
10/20 12:02, , 8F
10/20 12:02, 8F
推
10/20 12:02, , 9F
10/20 12:02, 9F
噓
10/20 12:02, , 10F
10/20 12:02, 10F
→
10/20 12:03, , 11F
10/20 12:03, 11F
→
10/20 12:03, , 12F
10/20 12:03, 12F
→
10/20 12:03, , 13F
10/20 12:03, 13F
噓
10/20 12:03, , 14F
10/20 12:03, 14F
噓
10/20 12:04, , 15F
10/20 12:04, 15F
噓
10/20 12:04, , 16F
10/20 12:04, 16F
推
10/20 12:04, , 17F
10/20 12:04, 17F
→
10/20 12:05, , 18F
10/20 12:05, 18F
噓
10/20 12:05, , 19F
10/20 12:05, 19F
噓
10/20 12:05, , 20F
10/20 12:05, 20F
推
10/20 12:05, , 21F
10/20 12:05, 21F
→
10/20 12:06, , 22F
10/20 12:06, 22F
噓
10/20 12:06, , 23F
10/20 12:06, 23F
→
10/20 12:06, , 24F
10/20 12:06, 24F
噓
10/20 12:07, , 25F
10/20 12:07, 25F
噓
10/20 12:07, , 26F
10/20 12:07, 26F
噓
10/20 12:07, , 27F
10/20 12:07, 27F
噓
10/20 12:08, , 28F
10/20 12:08, 28F
→
10/20 12:08, , 29F
10/20 12:08, 29F
推
10/20 12:08, , 30F
10/20 12:08, 30F
噓
10/20 12:09, , 31F
10/20 12:09, 31F
→
10/20 12:09, , 32F
10/20 12:09, 32F
噓
10/20 12:09, , 33F
10/20 12:09, 33F
噓
10/20 12:10, , 34F
10/20 12:10, 34F
噓
10/20 12:11, , 35F
10/20 12:11, 35F
噓
10/20 12:11, , 36F
10/20 12:11, 36F
推
10/20 12:12, , 37F
10/20 12:12, 37F
噓
10/20 12:13, , 38F
10/20 12:13, 38F
噓
10/20 12:13, , 39F
10/20 12:13, 39F
還有 70 則推文
噓
10/20 13:44, , 110F
10/20 13:44, 110F
噓
10/20 13:57, , 111F
10/20 13:57, 111F
→
10/20 14:03, , 112F
10/20 14:03, 112F
→
10/20 14:41, , 113F
10/20 14:41, 113F
噓
10/20 14:42, , 114F
10/20 14:42, 114F
噓
10/20 14:44, , 115F
10/20 14:44, 115F
噓
10/20 14:46, , 116F
10/20 14:46, 116F
噓
10/20 14:48, , 117F
10/20 14:48, 117F
噓
10/20 14:50, , 118F
10/20 14:50, 118F
推
10/20 15:02, , 119F
10/20 15:02, 119F
噓
10/20 15:12, , 120F
10/20 15:12, 120F
噓
10/20 15:13, , 121F
10/20 15:13, 121F
噓
10/20 15:15, , 122F
10/20 15:15, 122F
→
10/20 15:16, , 123F
10/20 15:16, 123F
噓
10/20 15:17, , 124F
10/20 15:17, 124F
噓
10/20 15:19, , 125F
10/20 15:19, 125F
→
10/20 15:20, , 126F
10/20 15:20, 126F
噓
10/20 15:25, , 127F
10/20 15:25, 127F
噓
10/20 15:26, , 128F
10/20 15:26, 128F
→
10/20 15:26, , 129F
10/20 15:26, 129F
→
10/20 15:27, , 130F
10/20 15:27, 130F
噓
10/20 15:49, , 131F
10/20 15:49, 131F
噓
10/20 15:51, , 132F
10/20 15:51, 132F
噓
10/20 15:51, , 133F
10/20 15:51, 133F
噓
10/20 15:56, , 134F
10/20 15:56, 134F
噓
10/20 16:00, , 135F
10/20 16:00, 135F
推
10/20 16:00, , 136F
10/20 16:00, 136F
噓
10/20 16:05, , 137F
10/20 16:05, 137F
噓
10/20 16:19, , 138F
10/20 16:19, 138F
噓
10/20 16:34, , 139F
10/20 16:34, 139F
推
10/20 16:40, , 140F
10/20 16:40, 140F
噓
10/20 16:58, , 141F
10/20 16:58, 141F
噓
10/20 17:14, , 142F
10/20 17:14, 142F
→
10/20 18:46, , 143F
10/20 18:46, 143F
噓
10/20 19:56, , 144F
10/20 19:56, 144F
噓
10/20 20:11, , 145F
10/20 20:11, 145F
噓
10/20 22:50, , 146F
10/20 22:50, 146F
噓
10/20 22:55, , 147F
10/20 22:55, 147F
→
10/24 06:37, , 148F
10/24 06:37, 148F
噓
10/26 10:36, , 149F
10/26 10:36, 149F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 10 篇):