Re: [討論] Curry最強大的先天條件是?
※ 引述《kblbjmj (kobe)》之銘言:
: 如果說一個球員有勁爆體能
: 一般而言,指的是跑得快或跳得高
: 而這些有勁爆體能的球員被認為是有先天上的優勢
: 傳統上,人們認為投籃跟運球是可以後天練出來的基本功
: 但是Curry這種投籃根本前無古人,
: 甚至可能後無來者,
: 到底Curry的投籃有沒有後人可以練出來?
: 他這種豪小投法,靠得到底是什麼先天條件?
: 是平衡感和協調性嗎?
: 以後有頂級平衡感和協調性的球員也能稱得上有勁爆體能嗎?
職業運動,沒有人在比苦練的,通通都是比誰的天分高而已
棒球場上,為什麼Chapman隨便投就160?
一堆人練了一輩子連稻村亞美的球速都沒有
很多人更是練了一輩子連中華職棒大聯盟都進不去,更不用說美國職棒
看看每年選秀陪榜的人有多少
為什麼田徑場上大家都說短跑是黑人的天下?
為什麼網球場上Federer曾經獨霸? Nadal紅土王者? 近年則是Djokovic無敵?
或許有人會說網球資源不平均阿,那我舉Murray(Murray迷抱歉)
Murray擁有的資源不輸Djokovic,為什麼遇到他輸球的次數比贏球多?
的確有些人,像Curry原本也不看好,林書豪也是,但他們有機緣發揮他們的天分
很多人有天分也苦練卻沒機緣(陳信安、陳金鋒)
而有天分沒苦練的呢? 張誌家
他當初在西武獅意見風發,被人說靠著天分在打球,練球態度隨便
結果最後被日本職棒釋出
以上的例子都是指職業運動,一般外面公園打球,可能苦練還行
但要進入職業殿堂,天分就是門票。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.224.66.196
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1462981399.A.4A4.html
※ 編輯: DreamerSun (61.224.66.196), 05/11/2016 23:44:23
→
05/11 23:44, , 1F
05/11 23:44, 1F
→
05/11 23:44, , 2F
05/11 23:44, 2F
※ 編輯: DreamerSun (61.224.66.196), 05/11/2016 23:44:45
噓
05/11 23:44, , 3F
05/11 23:44, 3F
→
05/11 23:45, , 4F
05/11 23:45, 4F
→
05/11 23:45, , 5F
05/11 23:45, 5F
我啊,我小時候整天打棒球結果球速只有90km,後來就放棄了
推
05/11 23:45, , 6F
05/11 23:45, 6F
→
05/11 23:46, , 7F
05/11 23:46, 7F
推
05/11 23:46, , 8F
05/11 23:46, 8F
※ 編輯: DreamerSun (61.224.66.196), 05/11/2016 23:47:03
→
05/11 23:46, , 9F
05/11 23:46, 9F
→
05/11 23:46, , 10F
05/11 23:46, 10F
※ 編輯: DreamerSun (61.224.66.196), 05/11/2016 23:47:41
→
05/11 23:47, , 11F
05/11 23:47, 11F
→
05/11 23:48, , 12F
05/11 23:48, 12F
想必你的球速一定是快到令人驚訝的地步,佩服佩服
※ 編輯: DreamerSun (61.224.66.196), 05/11/2016 23:48:47
→
05/11 23:49, , 13F
05/11 23:49, 13F
想必閣下的舉例一定是非常正確,等不及欣賞您的文采
推
05/11 23:50, , 14F
05/11 23:50, 14F
→
05/11 23:50, , 15F
05/11 23:50, 15F
※ 編輯: DreamerSun (61.224.66.196), 05/11/2016 23:51:03
推
05/11 23:51, , 16F
05/11 23:51, 16F
推
05/11 23:52, , 17F
05/11 23:52, 17F
推
05/11 23:54, , 18F
05/11 23:54, 18F
推
05/11 23:57, , 19F
05/11 23:57, 19F
推
05/11 23:57, , 20F
05/11 23:57, 20F
推
05/11 23:57, , 21F
05/11 23:57, 21F
推
05/11 23:57, , 22F
05/11 23:57, 22F
→
05/11 23:57, , 23F
05/11 23:57, 23F
→
05/11 23:58, , 24F
05/11 23:58, 24F
噓
05/12 00:00, , 25F
05/12 00:00, 25F
噓
05/12 00:01, , 26F
05/12 00:01, 26F
→
05/12 00:01, , 27F
05/12 00:01, 27F
→
05/12 00:01, , 28F
05/12 00:01, 28F
推
05/12 00:02, , 29F
05/12 00:02, 29F
→
05/12 00:02, , 30F
05/12 00:02, 30F
推
05/12 00:02, , 31F
05/12 00:02, 31F
→
05/12 00:02, , 32F
05/12 00:02, 32F
還有 68 則推文
還有 1 段內文
→
05/12 01:59, , 101F
05/12 01:59, 101F
推
05/12 02:22, , 102F
05/12 02:22, 102F
→
05/12 02:23, , 103F
05/12 02:23, 103F
→
05/12 02:52, , 104F
05/12 02:52, 104F
→
05/12 02:53, , 105F
05/12 02:53, 105F
噓
05/12 03:13, , 106F
05/12 03:13, 106F
→
05/12 03:14, , 107F
05/12 03:14, 107F
→
05/12 03:14, , 108F
05/12 03:14, 108F
→
05/12 03:15, , 109F
05/12 03:15, 109F
→
05/12 03:15, , 110F
05/12 03:15, 110F
→
05/12 03:25, , 111F
05/12 03:25, 111F
→
05/12 03:25, , 112F
05/12 03:25, 112F
噓
05/12 04:02, , 113F
05/12 04:02, 113F
→
05/12 04:02, , 114F
05/12 04:02, 114F
推
05/12 04:26, , 115F
05/12 04:26, 115F
推
05/12 04:30, , 116F
05/12 04:30, 116F
推
05/12 04:59, , 117F
05/12 04:59, 117F
噓
05/12 05:02, , 118F
05/12 05:02, 118F
推
05/12 06:00, , 119F
05/12 06:00, 119F
噓
05/12 06:19, , 120F
05/12 06:19, 120F
推
05/12 07:05, , 121F
05/12 07:05, 121F
→
05/12 07:05, , 122F
05/12 07:05, 122F
→
05/12 07:32, , 123F
05/12 07:32, 123F
噓
05/12 07:34, , 124F
05/12 07:34, 124F
推
05/12 07:37, , 125F
05/12 07:37, 125F
→
05/12 07:59, , 126F
05/12 07:59, 126F
推
05/12 08:19, , 127F
05/12 08:19, 127F
推
05/12 08:59, , 128F
05/12 08:59, 128F
噓
05/12 09:17, , 129F
05/12 09:17, 129F
→
05/12 09:17, , 130F
05/12 09:17, 130F
→
05/12 09:17, , 131F
05/12 09:17, 131F
→
05/12 09:17, , 132F
05/12 09:17, 132F
推
05/12 09:21, , 133F
05/12 09:21, 133F
→
05/12 09:22, , 134F
05/12 09:22, 134F
噓
05/12 09:41, , 135F
05/12 09:41, 135F
推
05/12 09:54, , 136F
05/12 09:54, 136F
→
05/12 10:45, , 137F
05/12 10:45, 137F
→
05/12 10:45, , 138F
05/12 10:45, 138F
噓
05/12 14:08, , 139F
05/12 14:08, 139F
噓
06/01 22:32, , 140F
06/01 22:32, 140F
討論串 (同標題文章)