Re: [問題] 氣球數量重不重要已回收
※ 引述《augt (本人已被刪除)》之銘言:
: 請問大家,你們認為汽車的安全氣囊數量多寡,重不重要?
: FORD的KUGA有6安全氣囊,其他車廠同牌價的房車很多都只有兩顆安全氣囊。
: 有聽過一種說法是:氣囊數多又怎樣?我慢慢開,頂多小擦傷。氣囊到我換車都用不到。
: 我個人是偏好,主動安全跟被動安全能越齊全越好,因為意外總是在意想不到的時候
: 發生,多一個保護總比事後懊悔來的值得。
: 大家的想法呢?
閒著沒事認真回一下。
之前還在米國洗學歷時,有同是台灣來的同學一車四人出遊。當時負責開車的是新
手駕駛,路上看到躺個死鹿擋道,一驚嚇就方向盤打過頭甩出車道,直接撞上剛撞
死鹿正等拖吊的車。事後看報告撞擊時推估是時速還有60哩。很幸運的是那輛車有
六顆氣球,全車人都只有輕微腦震盪,回家休養幾天就沒事,然後為了誰出醫藥費
跟罰金駕駛跟車主而翻臉互告(光救護車就1K鎂,剩下更別提)。後來有問醫生,
如果沒氣球的話,駕駛就不用擔心醫藥費的問題,後座大概會躺一個月。
所以簡單結論,自己命不值錢沒關係,死透就算了,但是考量到如果沒死透又要負
責賠錢的話,氣囊越多越好。
不過真的認真的說,沒事車上裝一堆排檔鎖柺杖鎖輪胎鎖,不就是為了那千萬分之
一的機率防止被宵小偷走,怎麼一碰到更重要的安全生死問題就現傻掉了?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.37.173.221
推
09/23 22:37, , 1F
09/23 22:37, 1F
推
09/23 22:39, , 2F
09/23 22:39, 2F
推
09/23 22:42, , 3F
09/23 22:42, 3F
→
09/23 22:43, , 4F
09/23 22:43, 4F
→
09/23 22:44, , 5F
09/23 22:44, 5F
→
09/23 22:45, , 6F
09/23 22:45, 6F
推
09/23 22:45, , 7F
09/23 22:45, 7F
推
09/23 22:47, , 8F
09/23 22:47, 8F
推
09/23 22:48, , 9F
09/23 22:48, 9F
→
09/23 22:49, , 10F
09/23 22:49, 10F
推
09/23 22:49, , 11F
09/23 22:49, 11F
→
09/23 22:49, , 12F
09/23 22:49, 12F
推
09/23 22:51, , 13F
09/23 22:51, 13F
→
09/23 22:51, , 14F
09/23 22:51, 14F
推
09/23 22:51, , 15F
09/23 22:51, 15F
推
09/23 22:53, , 16F
09/23 22:53, 16F
→
09/23 23:28, , 17F
09/23 23:28, 17F
→
09/23 23:28, , 18F
09/23 23:28, 18F
推
09/24 00:08, , 19F
09/24 00:08, 19F
噓
09/24 00:30, , 20F
09/24 00:30, 20F
→
09/24 00:34, , 21F
09/24 00:34, 21F
推
09/24 00:34, , 22F
09/24 00:34, 22F
→
09/24 00:54, , 23F
09/24 00:54, 23F
→
09/24 01:00, , 24F
09/24 01:00, 24F
→
09/24 01:01, , 25F
09/24 01:01, 25F
→
09/24 01:04, , 26F
09/24 01:04, 26F
→
09/24 01:05, , 27F
09/24 01:05, 27F
→
09/24 01:07, , 28F
09/24 01:07, 28F
→
09/24 01:44, , 29F
09/24 01:44, 29F
推
09/24 10:01, , 30F
09/24 10:01, 30F
噓
09/24 10:13, , 31F
09/24 10:13, 31F
→
09/24 10:43, , 32F
09/24 10:43, 32F
推
09/24 13:54, , 33F
09/24 13:54, 33F
→
09/24 23:06, , 34F
09/24 23:06, 34F
→
09/24 23:07, , 35F
09/24 23:07, 35F
→
09/24 23:11, , 36F
09/24 23:11, 36F
討論串 (同標題文章)