Re: [閒聊] JRPG爆死潮 從閃軌2到TOZ P5撐得住嗎?消失
※ 引述《probsk (紅墨水)》之銘言:
: : 上古卷軸,質量效應,巫師,GTA(有點不算),異塵餘生,生化奇兵,刺客教條
: : 闇龍紀元,蝙蝠俠阿卡漢,心靈殺手,巨龍之歌,好像隨手大作都一把抓
: 美式RPG在十幾二十年前已經歷過一批爆死潮
: 像什麼創世紀、魔法門、巫術等等一大票的,現在都沒了
啊? 我明明半年前才破了魔法門10
: 並不是美式RPG一直很強,而是活下來的美廠很強
: 你講的這些也差不多是全部了,而且還是近十年來的全部成果
: 而且你舉的這些有的也不是RPG吧,GTA?刺客?那無雙也算RPG了...
1. 怎麼我Steam 遊戲庫裡一堆美式RPG?
Might & Magic X, Wasteland2, Child of light, South park the stick of truth
banner saga, Deus EX : Human revolution, Legend of grimrock, Shaadowrun returns
Divinity : oringin sins
2. 活下來的美式RPG大廠, 只有Bethesda算成績單不錯, Bioware ME3 & DA2被罵翻,
DA3算不錯但沒回到DAO的水準
3. 最近這幾年明明是一堆小廠跟苟延殘喘的老廠交出來的東西最有趣
像CD projekt red在做The witcher 1的時候, 就只是間名不見經傳的小波蘭公司
Oblivion 的Fallout NV公認比Fallout 3好; South park the stick of truth超有趣
4. 美式RPG跟其他類遊戲的分界已經逐漸模糊
像Borderland算不算RPG? 很多遊戲網站認為它算
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.137.138.106
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1422459812.A.955.html
推
01/28 23:44, , 1F
01/28 23:44, 1F
→
01/28 23:45, , 2F
01/28 23:45, 2F
→
01/28 23:45, , 3F
01/28 23:45, 3F
推
01/28 23:45, , 4F
01/28 23:45, 4F
→
01/28 23:46, , 5F
01/28 23:46, 5F
推
01/28 23:46, , 6F
01/28 23:46, 6F
推
01/28 23:47, , 7F
01/28 23:47, 7F
→
01/28 23:47, , 8F
01/28 23:47, 8F
→
01/28 23:48, , 9F
01/28 23:48, 9F
→
01/28 23:48, , 10F
01/28 23:48, 10F
推
01/28 23:48, , 11F
01/28 23:48, 11F
→
01/28 23:48, , 12F
01/28 23:48, 12F
→
01/28 23:48, , 13F
01/28 23:48, 13F
→
01/28 23:49, , 14F
01/28 23:49, 14F
→
01/28 23:49, , 15F
01/28 23:49, 15F
→
01/28 23:49, , 16F
01/28 23:49, 16F
→
01/28 23:49, , 17F
01/28 23:49, 17F
→
01/28 23:50, , 18F
01/28 23:50, 18F
→
01/28 23:50, , 19F
01/28 23:50, 19F
推
01/28 23:51, , 20F
01/28 23:51, 20F
推
01/28 23:51, , 21F
01/28 23:51, 21F
推
01/28 23:51, , 22F
01/28 23:51, 22F
→
01/28 23:51, , 23F
01/28 23:51, 23F
推
01/28 23:53, , 24F
01/28 23:53, 24F
→
01/28 23:53, , 25F
01/28 23:53, 25F
→
01/28 23:54, , 26F
01/28 23:54, 26F
推
01/28 23:54, , 27F
01/28 23:54, 27F
推
01/28 23:56, , 28F
01/28 23:56, 28F
推
01/28 23:56, , 29F
01/28 23:56, 29F
推
01/28 23:57, , 30F
01/28 23:57, 30F
推
01/28 23:58, , 31F
01/28 23:58, 31F
→
01/28 23:59, , 32F
01/28 23:59, 32F
推
01/28 23:59, , 33F
01/28 23:59, 33F
→
01/28 23:59, , 34F
01/28 23:59, 34F
推
01/29 00:08, , 35F
01/29 00:08, 35F
→
01/29 00:08, , 36F
01/29 00:08, 36F
→
01/29 00:09, , 37F
01/29 00:09, 37F
推
01/29 00:11, , 38F
01/29 00:11, 38F
推
01/29 00:16, , 39F
01/29 00:16, 39F
→
01/29 00:35, , 40F
01/29 00:35, 40F
推
01/29 00:36, , 41F
01/29 00:36, 41F
→
01/29 00:36, , 42F
01/29 00:36, 42F
→
01/29 00:37, , 43F
01/29 00:37, 43F
→
01/29 00:39, , 44F
01/29 00:39, 44F
推
01/29 01:34, , 45F
01/29 01:34, 45F
→
01/29 01:34, , 46F
01/29 01:34, 46F
推
01/29 05:10, , 47F
01/29 05:10, 47F
→
01/29 05:11, , 48F
01/29 05:11, 48F
推
01/29 18:29, , 49F
01/29 18:29, 49F
推
01/29 18:38, , 50F
01/29 18:38, 50F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 9 之 10 篇):